brave new world
by aldous huxley
★★★★★
dates read: 6/5/22 - 6/13/22
"Brave New World is a dystopian novel by English author Aldous Huxley, written in 1931 and published in 1932. Largely set in a futuristic World State, inhabited by genetically modified citizens and an intelligence-based social hierarchy, the novel anticipates huge scientific advancements in reproductive technology, sleep-learning, psychological manipulation and classical conditioning that are combined to make a dystopian society which is challenged by only a single individual: the story's protagonist."
i'm a big fan of speculative dystopian, but i think that brave new world takes the cake. i originally read brave new world in high school, but didn't have many thoughts on the book at the time. fortunately, i decided to really give huxley a fair shot, outside of an academic setting, and found myself pleasantly surprised.
this book can be difficult to grasp on one's first read, high school me included. there's a lot of scientific jargon that gets thrown into the beginning that may take you a few rereads in order to fully grasp and shakespeare passages that can be hard to understand at one's initial glance, but trust me when i say that it's worth it.
the society depicted in brave new world, the world state, is uncomfortable to read. it's uncanny. there are babies made from tubes, children who are openly encouraged to explore their sexuality, drugs that can turn a frown upside down in seconds, and the concept of monogamy is considered taboo. everyone belongs to everyone. there is no such thing as possession as in mine or yours or theirs.
while on the surface it appears that the world state contrasts our society in every way, shape, and form, the deeper one thinks, the less true that becomes. slowly, the facets of huxley's fictional world start to resemble our own. the world state is a society that hyperbolizes mass consumption and excessive consumerism. think about the size of fast food sodas or extra large movie theatre popcorns in modern america. except in the world state there is unlimited refills with unrestricted access. despite brave new world appearing other-worldly to readers, its foundations are rooted in hedonistic ideologies that value instant gratification through overconsumption and materialism.
“But I don't want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness. I want sin.”
john the savage in brave new world is another facet of this book that i found had interesting implications. he is placed in opposition of the concept "ignorance is bliss," which is a fundamental component of the world state. john the savage yearns for a life that involves discomfort. the harshest moments of reality perpetuate authenticity, even if it requires the sacrifice of comfort and happiness.
one of my favorite things about this book is the discourse that has ensued over whether the world state is really all that bad. some people believe that there is nothing wrong with the society in brave new world, completely negating huxley's point in his creation of the novel. don't get me wrong, i would love to live in a world where there are no consequences, forever existing in a permanent state of euphoria, but at that point, are you even really living anymore? is there any meaning in the the good when there is no bad? the bad helps contruct identity, personhood, self. without the bad, we'd be automatons, copy and paste, repeat. replication in brave new world is seen as a fundamental pillar of peace, while deviations do the opposite. i can understand both arguments.
happiness (even if it's a facade) vs. truth, it's a difficult question to answer, and while brave new world poses these two facets against each other, they are also not mutually exclusive. truth paves the way for one to reach a different kind of happiness that acknowledges the good and bad in totality. acceptance.
this novel honestly felt like a thought experiment, forcing the reader to delve into their own ideologies surrounding happiness. there are just too many things that i could mention in regards to huxley’s novel but this is definitely one of those books i would recommend everyone reads at least once just so i can hear their opinion on the proposed dilemma.